ADVANCE infectious diseases pharmacy through collaboration, research and education and LEAD antimicrobial stewardship to OPTIMIZE the care of patients with infections in every practice setting

Role of Pharmacists in Antibiotic Stewardship in the Emergency Department

  • 06 Jul 2017 10:52 AM
    Message # 4935842
    Anonymous

    SIDP Position Statement on the Role of Pharmacists in Antibiotic Stewardship in the Emergency Department

    Thomas Dilworth, George Delgado, Brandon Dionne, Patrick McDaneld, , Shakeel Khan, Rebekah Wrenn Emily Heil, and Michael D. Nailor

    Preamble

    Emergency Medicine (EM) pharmacists have expanded roles as members of the emergency department (ED) inter-disciplinary care team.  EM pharmacists can improve the safety and care of patients as they provide drug information resources, assist with allergy clarification and interpretation, guide medication selection, optimize dosing, and help prepare patients transitioning between the ED and ambulatory or long-term care settings. Many of these patients receive antibiotics for documented or suspected infections.  The fast-paced nature of the emergency department coupled with high patient turnover and lack of definitive culture results to inform antibiotic prescribing may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use. Appropriate antimicrobial use is a national safety priority.  It is imperative that antimicrobials are utilized appropriately in the ED in order to ensure initial appropriate therapy for patients with infections while simultaneously and appropriately limiting their use to prevent the spread of resistant organisms. The Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists supports and encourages EM pharmacists in taking a leadership role in the promotion of judicious antimicrobial use as other duties allow, including, but not limited to:

    Optimizing antimicrobial therapy prescribed in the emergency department

    EM pharmacists are uniquely suited to review a patient’s medical record for prior culture results and susceptibility interpretation, antimicrobial therapy, antimicrobial drug interactions, and patient risk factors for resistant organisms in order to assist in initiation of appropriate therapy. This review allows EM pharmacists to discuss with the provider more appropriate antimicrobial(s) and route of administration for the patient. Additionally, EM pharmacists can ensure appropriate antimicrobial administration in a timely and optimized manner to patients who require immediate therapy (e.g. for patients with sepsis).  EM pharmacists can also work to optimize dosing based on patient specific factors such as reduced or enhanced elimination of drug, body weight, or pharmacodynamic enhancement of regimens. By clarifying and interpreting allergy history, EM pharmacists can limit the use of second and third line agents from inaccurate or incomplete allergy histories. EM pharmacists can also review and intervene upon antimicrobials prescribed to patients being discharged back into the community for appropriateness and for the ability to acquire the drug taking into account the patient’s insurance and ability to pay for medications.

    Creation of emergency department-specific antibiograms and infection-specific clinical pathways

    Antibiotic resistance patterns observed in the emergency department often differ substantially from those observed in the inpatient setting.  EM pharmacists should be involved in the creation and maintenance of emergency department-specific antibiograms based on location of the patient, antibiotic resistance risk factors, or disease states of patients presenting to the emergency department to guide appropriate empiric therapy. Additionally, antibiogram data should be incorporated into the creation of infection-specific clinical pathways (e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infection and skin/skin structure infections) to guide other healthcare providers.

    Culture call back

    EM pharmacists should be involved in reviewing positive cultures for patients discharged back to the community.  EM pharmacists should collaborate with EM providers and review discharged patients’ cultures and susceptibilities to ensure they have received effective antimicrobial therapy. Collaborative practice agreements between EM pharmacists and EM physicians can help expedite these therapeutic changes.

    Education of the medical and general community

    EM pharmacists should develop education related to empiric antimicrobial selection and local antimicrobial resistance patterns for EM providers.  EM pharmacists should also participate in larger antimicrobial stewardship educational initiatives such as the CDC’s ‘Get Smart about Antibiotics’ week by developing similar education and initiatives tailored to the ED setting.  This can likely be done in coordination with their local antimicrobial stewardship program. EM pharmacists can also engage patients about appropriate use of antibiotics, including why a patient may not being prescribed an antibiotic, the need to closely adhere to antimicrobials prescribed, and potential consequences of antibiotics including side effects and Clostridium difficile infections. Additional educational efforts can be incorporated in Culture Call Back collaborations including notifying primary care providers of results and therapy and the public about sexually transmitted infection (STI) culture results and treatments. EM pharmacists can provide valuable information regarding prevention of STIs and the consequences of additional infections.

    Participation in Local Antimicrobial Stewardship Team

    EM pharmacists should work collaboratively with or be an active member of the local antimicrobial stewardship committee.

    Focused Antimicrobial Stewardship Training

    EM pharmacists should seek to further their expertise in antimicrobial stewardship by obtaining additional training specifically in antimicrobial stewardship via continuing education or certificate programs. Antimicrobial stewardship principles should also be incorporated into EM PGY II training curricula.


  • 06 Jul 2017 12:35 PM
    Reply # 4936065 on 4935842

    Again, nicely done by the authors!

    The name for "Get Smart About Antibiotics" week has recently changed to the less sexy "U.S. Antibiotic Awareness Week".  https://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/week/index.html 

    Is there any role for the "culture call-back" to work in the opposite way as well?  Call back and suggest DISCONTINUATION of abx if subsequently determined there was no infection?  [Not sure if there is any data on this ... I don't step foot in the ED.]

    Participation in Local AST:

    I think this section needs a few more sentences to beef it up.  It's so sad looking, compared to the others.  How about a sentence regarding creating and enforcing guidelines in common ED scenarios, such as asymptomatic bacteruria?

    Any role for PCN skin testing in the ED?  

  • 07 Jul 2017 11:46 AM
    Reply # 4937364 on 4935842

    Hi - this is an important position piece and the authors are to be commended for putting it forward.

    I have a couple concerns / comments to add (in blue):

    1. While supporting the role of the EM pharmacist, I wonder if the statement can emphasize a more collaborative nature of the EM pharmacist with ID/ASP personnel.  You also wonder where there are both ASP pharmacists and EM Pharmacists whose purview these things fall under and don't want to get into territory wars. I'm not sure the best way to incorporate this in the statement but it is something to consider.

    More specifically this section: 

    Creation of emergency department-specific antibiograms and infection-specific clinical pathways

    Antibiotic resistance patterns observed in the emergency department often differ substantially from those observed in the inpatient setting.  EM pharmacists, along with other antimicrobial stewardship team members and EM personnel, should be involved in the creation and maintenance of emergency department-specific antibiograms based on location of the patient, antibiotic resistance risk factors, or disease states of patients presenting to the emergency department to guide appropriate empiric therapy. Additionally, antibiogram data should be incorporated into the creation of infection-specific clinical pathways (e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infection and skin/skin structure infections) to guide other healthcare providers.

    2. Many hospitals do not have EM pharmacists available. Regrettably, some EDs are not staffed at all, while others only have daytime weekday coverage. Many community hospitals use systems that dispense from automated dispensing cabinets and pharmacy doesn't even see the orders. 

    Culture call back

    EM pharmacists (when available, and along with ID/Antimicrobial Stewardship personnel) should be involved in reviewing positive cultures for patients discharged back to the community.  EM pharmacists should collaborate with EM providers and review discharged patients’ cultures and susceptibilities to ensure they have received effective antimicrobial therapy. Collaborative practice agreements between EM pharmacists and EM physicians can help expedite these therapeutic changes.

    3. I suggest not limiting training to just antimicrobial stewardship but may also state more broadly infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship. Also is it possible to state they should make a commitment to ongoing education in the area of infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship that reflects the continually changing nature of this field and incorporates new developments in antimicrobial resistance, diagnostics and stewardship into their practice?

    Focused Antimicrobial Stewardship Training

    EM pharmacists should seek to further their expertise in antimicrobial stewardship by obtaining additional training specifically in infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship via continuing education or certificate programs. Antimicrobial stewardship principles should also be incorporated into EM PGY II training curricula.

    4. Perhaps the authors also debated this point, but should the title of the statement be: 


    SIDP Position Statement on the Role of Pharmacists in Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department
  • 24 Jul 2017 11:21 AM
    Reply # 4992043 on 4935842

    I agree with the previous comments. Just minor things from us at McLeod. A few grammatical errors here and there, including language inconsistencies (i.e. would use "ED" consistently vs "emergency department" since the abbreviation was defined).


Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists •  PO Box 1488, Warrenville, IL 60555
(331) 248-7888sidp@affinity-strategies.com
Proudly Managed by Affinity Strategies

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software